We Must Be Doing Something Good If They Have To Resort To This!

This information has come to me via my professional body. It seems, from what is here, that attempts where made to fabricate information with respect to the safety of herbal medicine. Information, which was later used as the basis for the EU legislating THMPD. Those responsible do not serve the public interest and would appear to have misused their position of authority and trust. If you cry wolf too often...soon no one will listen anymore. I am not surprised by this at all. It seems information was fabricated to excuse our involvement in Iraq. When millions and billions of pounds in profit are involved what do you expect.....integrity?   The Green Man.

The latest news in on the SR front is that the Alliance for Natural Health, which previously  hosted the EHTPA’s petition for SR, has now published a major report that completely  undermines the EHTPA’s false argument. The underlying theme of the article is in line with the challenge to the ANH that Sandy made  earlier in the year, that forced them to back down over one and withdraw one of their  postings on the subject. Print outs of the text are available and I can e-mail out more copies if there are not enough to  go round. The ANH has the following article on its website about the Aristolochia case. This case still forms the main  argument used by the pro-SR lobby to illustrate how dangerous herbs are, which is perhaps remarkable  when one reads the article. Maybe the pro-SR people simply do not believe the ANH, are choosing not to  believe them, or just haven't read the article. The article calls on everyone to spread this news far and wide,  so why not do so?! "Chris Dhaenens: the truth about Aristolochia Dr. Dhaenens lives in Belgium and is a specialist in  toxicology and pharmacognosy of Chinese herbs. Chris Dhaenens of the EBF then spoke on the technical aspects of the THMPD. He detailed for MEPs many  of the ways in which the Directive is unsuitable for its purpose of regulating all forms of herbal medicine,  regardless of tradition. With no products designed for use in Ayurveda or traditional Chinese medicine  (TCM) yet registered under the scheme, something has clearly gone terribly wrong. Chris Dhaenens presenting at the European Parliament The key part of Mr Dhaenens’ presentation concerned the Chinese herb Aristolochia fangchi and the origins  of the current regulatory problems. Many readers will be familiar with the story: back in 1990 in Brussels,  Belgium, the very seat of the EU, 135 of around 15,000 people given a preparation containing Aristolochia  as a slimming aid suffered irreversible kidney damage. The problems were attributed solely to Aristolochia,  and a new condition was named in honour of the case, so-called “Chinese herb nephropathy” or CHN. We  can see the direct results of the Belgian cases in the threat to herbal medicine posed by the THMPD, which  was originally designed to ensure that similar cases did not occur again. Mr Dhaenens and his colleagues have spent 20 years looking closely into the Aristolochia case. As trained  TCM practitioners and scientists, they were shocked that Aristolochia was implicated for CHN, given that they had prescribed it to thousands of patients in that time without a single episode of kidney failure. As it  turns out, the ‘Aristolochia cases’ are nothing of the sort, and CHN has been entirely mischaracterised. As  time has elapsed and more evidence has emerged over what went on in the clinic, it seems there may have  been a cover-up and malicious intent to damage the reputation of herbal medicine and allow the doctors to  walk away unscathed. The story looks more and more like the plot of the latest bestselling thriller!The dangers of orthodox medical arrogance – not of herbal medicine Mr Dhaenens told the audience that all 135 cases came from a single clinic in Brussels over a period of 5 months. Closer inspection revealed that the cocktail in question was prescribed, not by herbal practitioners  trained in TCM and use of the Chinese pharmacopoeia, but by orthodox medics entirely unskilled in the  herbal tradition with which they were dabbling. In Belgium and throughout the EU, “authorised health-care professionals” – usually doctors and pharmacists  – can prescribe unlicensed medicines, including herbal medicines. This gives medical doctors the ability to  prescribe any herbs they wish, despite often not knowing their radix from their stamen! The doctors prescribed Aristolochia as a slimming aid, an indication not found in any Chinese  pharmacopoeia. As Mr Dhaenens stated, “The Aristolochia case is the best example we can find that herbs  should not be used out of their context.” Not only that, but the cocktail they prescribed contained several  amphetamine-like substances – many of which have since been legally restricted for their danger to human  health. Mr Dhaenens emphasised that Aristolochia can be toxic under normal circumstances, but that this  toxicity is both acute and reversible and never leads to irreparable kidney damage. As an added bonus for  their patients, the doctors gave them a big dose of intravenous serotonin. Given such a potent brew of  circumstances – doctors prescribing outside their competence a mixture of substances that included  amphetamine-like ingredients, many of which are now banned, along with serotonin – it is quite amazing  that the investigators managed to blame the kidney failure entirely on Aristolochia fangchi. Aristolochia not to blame But the real bombshell was to follow. Three court cases have occurred since 1993, the findings of which  have never been publicised. All three judgements in these cases were unequivocal in stating, in Mr  Dhaenens’ words, “There is no connection between the pathology of the victims and the herb Aristolochia,  and that other scenarios should be investigated. That’s what we did for 20 years, and now scientific research  establishes that…probably ochratoxin is at the root of this problem.” Regulation built on a fallacy Think about that for a moment. The cases of irreversible kidney damage attributed to a single Chinese herb,  Aristolochia, had nothing to do with Aristolochia. Yet these cases were used to justify the regulatory  framework represented by the THMPD, a framework that has since been skewed in such a way that it now  threatens entire herbal traditions with extinction in the EU as well as EU citizens’ freedom of choice and  self-determination. The skewing is such that the Directive does not even provide a suitable regime for the  very traditions it was supposed to regulate! The root of the Belgian ‘Aristolochia problem’, as it happens,  had everything to do with orthodox medical doctors working outside their competence, prescribing herbs in  a cavalier manner with no respect for the traditions from which they came. This is probably the biggest untold story in herbal medicine – ever!